The Armoury of His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry (Wilcock, Arms & Armour, 2012)
University of Huddersfield Repository
Wilcock, Paul
The Armoury of His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry
Original Citation
Wilcock, Paul (2012) The Armoury of His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry. Arms &
Armour, 9 (2). pp. 181-205. ISSN 17416124
This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/17394/
The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the
University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items
on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners.
Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally
can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any
format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit
purposes without prior permission or charge, provided:
•
•
•
The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy;
A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and
The content is not changed in any way.
For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please
contact the Repository Team at: [email protected].
http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/
The Armoury of His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry
It is rare for an historian to walk into a room and be awestruck by what he finds
there. This was the author’s experience on being invited to view the Buccleuch
Collection of arms at armour at Boughton House. It comprises an outstanding
collection of arms and armour spanning almost 600 years.
It is important first, to recognise that this collection of arms and armour is not
the product of an enthusiastic acquisitor building an egocentric private museum
according to personal interest or whim.1 Instead, this is a group of objects that in
a practical sense has become part of the family. The greater proportion of the
collection is at Boughton2 however highly important pieces of the overall group
have remained in situ at Drumlanrig3 and Bowhill4 with a few elements of the
collection remaining on loan to the National Museum of Scotland; there
representing a unique aspect of Scottish national heritage as well as a reflection
of the significance of the Douglas and Scott parts of the family to the history of
Scotland.
This family, combining Scottish and English ancestry, inevitably finds itself
surrounded by arms and armour with an equally unique thematic thread, tying it
inexorably to the historical events of both countries. The antagonistic nature of
many of those events has led to a collection that might in many ways be
regarded as sterile in the sense that these items no longer have a role to play in
the drama of historical engagement. The nature of that sterility however is
enshrined in the fact that these are pieces which have been unadulterated over
the years. These artefacts were laid to rest in the armouries of the family homes,
while continuing to reflect their combined ancestral heritage. The status of the
Montagu, Douglas and Scott families is reflected in the outstanding quality of the
arms and armour they could afford to purchase. Nothing here is pedestrian, from
individual pieces such as the unique collection of guns by Lewis Barbar to the
groups of hangers issued to estate staff with high quality hand forged blades;
from the roundels of cavalry sabres equipping a variety of cavalry units to the
selection of sporting guns by renowned gunsmiths such as John Manton. Although
no longer in use, these items have continued to receive exemplary care and
attention. The result is eloquently summarised in a letter from the Master of the
Armouries of H.M.Tower of London5:
“This house contains by far the most important and historic family gunroom to
survive in the British Isles. Not only is it the largest group of antique guns and
pistols of one family in this country, but the quality of the pieces is exceptionally
high. Several of the suites of guns are unique and are of great importance to the
history of this country. The series of family swords from the sixteenth century
onward is unparalleled anywhere else in the world. Taken as a whole your
collection is second only to that at Windsor Castle, and in some ways it
complements that in that yours contains many things of which the Queen has no
1
There are many examples of these throughout Europe in particular one of the most famous being the
Brunon collection of Napoleonic arms and armour in Salon de Provence, France
2
Boughton House Northamptonshire was purchased in 1528 by Sir Edward Montagu who among other
roles served as one of the Lord Chief Justices to King Henry VIII
3
Drumlanrig Castle has been the seat of the Douglas family with records dating at least back to 1388.
4
Bowhill House, Selkirk is the seat of the Scott family from the Earls of Buccleuch
5
A.V.B.Norman had an outstanding career as a museum professional culminating in being Master of
the Armouries 1977-1988. His work is still regarded as a foremost authority on a number of areas of
the study of arms and armour. He died in 1998
1
example. For the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, the armoury at Boughton
far surpasses the collection in the [Royal] Armouries both in quality and
condition.”6
A.V.B.Norman FSA, FSA Scot.
Master of the Armouries of H.M.Tower of London
This is indeed a rare accolade from a man who had spent his life’s work with the
finest arms and armour in the world.
The armoury at Boughton House.
While the Montagu-Douglas-Scott family are now united this was not always so.
William, 1st Earl of Douglas fought with the French against the English at Poitiers
and came from a family which supported both William Wallace and Robert the
Bruce7. It was this family that eventually rebuilt Drumlanrig Castle under the
auspices of William Douglas, 1st Duke of Queensberry (1637-95). There are three
fine examples of ‘Lowland’ type swords which date from the late 16th century.
One at Drumlanrig8, a two handed sword with fullered broad blade reflects the
standard ‘Lowland’ type and is supported by two further examples at Boughton.9
This type of sword has its historic roots in the regions of Scotland where these
families were established. All three swords are typologically similar to ones in the
National Museum of Scotland and illustrated in John Wallis’s Scottish Swords and
6
A.V.B. Norman quoted from a letter written to His Grace John, Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry
28th October 1987
7
Brown M.H., William, 1st Earl of Douglas (1330-1384) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography,
Oxford University Press (2004)
8
Drumlanrig Castle located in the Douglas Room.
9
Boughton House displayed on the Armoury South Wall
2
Dirks.10 The decoration and fringes on one of the Boughton examples may
support the view that in their twilight years these were used as bearing swords.11
Scottish lowland sword
The Scott family is recorded in the 11th century but for the purposes of this paper
Walter, 1st Lord Scott of Buccleuch (1565-1611) is the earliest of the family line of
particular historical significance. The most famous connection emerges with the
marriage of Anna Scott,12 who held the title of Countess of Buccleuch in her own
right, to James Scott, Duke of Monmouth the first born, albeit illegitimate son of
Charles II and Lucy Walter.13 He was created The Duke of Monmouth and
Buccleuch. The Monmouth Rebellion effectively ended at the Battle of Sedgemoor
and culminated in James Scott’s execution on Tower Hill in 1685.14 Because his
wife Anna held the Buccleuch title suo jure it was not subject to attainder and
with her son James, now Earl of Dalkeith, spent considerable time re-establishing
10
Wallis J. M., Scottish Swords and Dirks, London (1970). Very similar examples of these swords are
illustrated by Wallis pp18-19 ill. 9 & 11 and referenced as LA5 and LA6, both in the collection of what
was known at the time the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland
11
Culloden: The Swords and the Sorrows illustrates a further example of this type of sword dating it
between 1525-50.p.24 Illustration 1:4
12
Nicholson E.E.C., Scott Anna, Duchess of Monmouth and suo jure Duchess of Buccleuch (16511732), Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press (2004)
13
Lucy Walter is recorded as living from 1630-58. The relationship with Charles II was in no doubt
though he consistently denied rumours that they had secretly married. She died in Paris at the age of 28
14
Harrison B., The Tower of London Prisoner Book, Leeds (2004). The Tower records list
Monmouth’s execution on 15th July 1685 with a marginal note that it required the executioner, Ketch
five strokes of the axe before completing the task with a carving knife. Monmouth is buried in the
Chapel Royal of St Peter ad Vincula within the Tower of London
3
Dalkeith Palace.15 The houses of Scott and Douglas were soon to be connected by
the marriage of James to Jane Douglas.16 The family still retains a number of
artefacts linked to the Duke of Monmouth including a saddle and horse garniture
and a fine sword which is illustrated in several paintings of Monmouth and is in
the family’s collection at Bowhill.17 The sword’s hilt and scabbard mounts can be
dated to the third quarter of the 17th century with the mount being marked to
Dumont of Paris and the hilt almost identical to one illustrated in Laking18
belonging to Louis XIV and in the Musee d’Artillerie in Paris with a blade dated
1667.
The Montagu family can trace its ancestry back to the Norman Conquest however
the Armoury at Boughton began to be established after the initial purchase of
part of the estate by Sir Edward Montagu, one of Henry VIII’s Lord Chief Justices
in 1528. There are several examples of material in the Armoury dating to this
period. One of the better known is an English broadsword of the 16th century.
This is comprehensively illustrated by Claude Blair in his chapter in Caldwell.19
Here Claude Blair20 argues that this is one of the earliest prototypes of basket
hilted swords and identifies its importance in its parallel to one in the Redfern
Collection and dating this sword to around 1520. The founder of Boughton was
succeeded by three more of his namesake and it was under the tenure of Edward
1st Lord Montagu and his son 2nd Lord Montagu that the increasing number of
additions to the Armoury reflected the traumas of the English Civil War.21 The 1st
Lord Montagu was a Puritan and a Member of Parliament but struggled with the
conflict between his beliefs and his loyalty to the King.22 This personal conflict
ultimately led him to the Tower23 though as a result of his advancing years he
was permitted to take quarters near the Savoy until his death in 1644. His son
Edward24 was a staunch supporter of Parliament but respected the King and
bitterly opposed his execution. As a result he was excluded from politics and
played little further part in public life. While he welcomed the restoration of
Charles II he still preferred solitude and did not reengage in politics and died in
1684. Perhaps paradoxically there is a striking portrait at Boughton of Oliver
Cromwell in the Egyptian Hall despite the family’s loyalty to the King.
15
Dalkeith Palace was rebuilt in 1702 on the site of an earlier castle and is still owned by the family.
Since 1985 has been leased to the University of Wisconsin for their study abroad programme
16
Jane Douglas was the daughter of James Douglas, 2nd Duke of Queensberry. The later marriage of
their grandson Henry, 3rd Duke of Buccleuch and 5th Duke of Queensberry to Elizabeth Montagu the
daughter of Mary Montagu and George Brudenell, 4th Earl of Cardigan and created Duke of Montagu
makes the final connection between the three families.
17
While the sword’s scabbard mount and hilt appear to be contemporary with Monmouth the blade is a
later replacement, possibly due to breakage and carries George I’s coat of arms
18
Laking Sir G.E., A Record of European Arms through Seven Centuries, London (1919) Volume V,
p.101 figure1521 of classmark J383 Musee D’Artillerie, Paris
19
Caldwell D.H., Scottish Fortifications and Weapons, Edinburgh (1981) ‘’The Early Basket Hilt in
Britain’ by Claude Blair p.201 illustrations 99-101
20
Claude Blair OBE, (30 November 1922 – 21st February 2010) was one of the most distinguished
arms and armour specialists of his generation spending much of his career at the Victoria & Albert
Museum as Keeper of Metalwork
21
These include both armour and a significant range of edged weapons relating to the conflict that will
be examined later in the paper.
22
His loyalty was perhaps reflected in the fact that in January 1606 he initiated the Bill for public
thanksgiving to celebrate the defeat of the Gunpowder Plot each year on the 5th November
23
Harrison B., The Tower of London Prisoner Book, Leeds (2004).Montagu is recorded as being held
in the Tower from 10th September 1642 for “declaring his dissatisfaction with Parliament’s attitude
towards the King”
24
Cust R., Montagu Edward, 1st Baron Montagu of Boughton (1562/3-1644), Oxford Dictionary of
National Biography, Oxford University Press (2004)
4
The Montagu dynasty continued with Ralph who after the death of his older
brother assumed the title and played a major role in the development of
Boughton. Weapons of French influence reflect Ralph’s connections with the court
of Louis XIV where he served as Ambassador Extraordinaire to Louis XIV in the
periods 1669-71 and 1676-7. Among the collection of small-swords there are
outstanding examples of exquisite workmanship reflecting both a distinct French
influence and Ralph’s taste for the fashion of the day. One of the most elaborate
is an early transitional small-sword dating from around 1675, and a similar but
slightly later sword, dating from the turn of the 18th century, both of which
illustrate the changing fashion of the time. The collection also boasts some fine
sporting guns from this period. These include an over and under, turn over
flintlock gun by Thuraine of Paris,25a flintlock fowling piece bearing the Montagu
crest on both the breech and lock, and a flintlock fowling piece by Lahitte et Cuny
of Paris26 can be accurately dated to Duke Ralph’s sojourns at the French court.
Perhaps the most famous member of the Montagu dynasty of Boughton was John
2nd Duke.27 He married Mary Churchill daughter of the Duke of Marlborough and
despite joining Marlborough in Flanders in 1706, had little taste for war and
returned to England. It is ironic then that despite this, the 2nd Duke is almost
certainly responsible for the largest quantity of ordnance in the Boughton
Armoury. However, while he may have had little taste for carnage, he had
enormous taste for fine weapons. By the time of his death in 1749 he had served
as Master of Ordnance and had utilised his position to commission significant
quantities of weaponry. One of the most famous of these are the Puckle Guns of
which this collection boasts two examples, the second on loan at Beaulieu.28 A
remarkable invention, these guns were a forerunner of the machine gun and were
fed by drum-magazines, firing either square or round shaped projectiles selected
depending upon the religion of the foe!. The date of the patent29 indicates that
the 2nd Duke may have commissioned these guns prior to the attempt to colonise
St Lucia and St Vincent.
25
Thuraine (the senior of a father and son partnership) working in Paris from 1630-1690. He held the
title of ‘Arquebussier Ordinaire du Roi’ making fine guns not only for Louis XIV but also for the
Swedish royal family
26
Lahitte et Cuny worked in Paris between 1675-1685
27
Metzger E.C., Montagu John, 2nd Duke of Montagu (1690-1749), Oxford Dictionary of National
Biography, Oxford University Press (2004)
28
A third example is known to exist at the Tøjhusmuseet in Copenhagen
29
Patent Number 418 of 1718
5
The Puckle Gun
Drum magazine for the Puckle Gun
As Master of Ordnance there is no doubt that some weapons when obsolete were
moved to Boughton two examples of which are a heavy dragoon pistol marked
with a crown ‘GR’ cypher and ‘Tower 1742’ and a falchion marked ‘Made in
Hounsloe for the Tower’.
John’s daughter Mary married George Brudenell in 1767; their daughter Elizabeth
married Henry, 3rd Duke of Buccleuch (1746-1812) combining finally the
Montagu-Douglas-Scott family as Dukes of Buccleuch and Queensberry.
Following on from the examples already illustrated, the swords in this collection
fall into three distinct categories. Civilian swords designed for fashionable display
6
at court and in public; those which have been acquired by the family as a result
of a range of overseas engagements and Grand Tours, and finally those which are
military in nature and range from high status officers’ swords to basic munition
grade weapons which are comparatively rare since most were eventually disposed
of.
In a similar vein the guns reflect three distinct genres. Those acquired to fulfil a
commitment to support the social fabric of the community which include muskets
for the Northamptonshire Militia or the Edinburgh Militia. There are those utilised
for sport and the provision of recreation and food for both household and
retainers including both punt guns and sporting shotguns. Finally those
exceptional items that were the result of patronage of some of the finest
gunsmiths in the world such as the guns of Barbar, Manton and Giffard and show
developing technological progress.
A few fine examples of 16th century ordnance have already been described earlier
in this paper. With those exceptions few items have survived within the collection
however there is some armour, one example of which is an English Church
helmet, there is also a partisan head and a blackened steel mace of similar date,
the significant body of the collection begins to emerge in the first half of the 17th
century.
The examples of early guns within this collection are few but of the highest
quality. A magnificent pair of German wheel-lock pistols represents some of the
finest in any private collection.
German wheellock pistols
After the style of Caspar Spat of Munich, Claude Blair considers them to be
Munich School and dates them around 1650. They appear in the inventory of
Montagu House in Whitehall in 1746.30 A pair of Teschian long wheel-lock holster
pistols also represents early examples of the gunmakers craft. Finally dating from
around 1660 is a fascinating example of a miquelet-lock, break-action, breechloading gun. Made in Spain with a Catalan style stock this once again is
representative of the early gunmakers art, particularly because it still retains the
pouch with five spare steel chambers. Guns such as this, are remarkably rare and
30
Claude Blair argues that these are in fact by Spat and are completely representative of the Munich
School in Murdoch T., p226
7
create a great deal of interest because of their importance as both aesthetic and
technological objects.
The earliest swords to be found in any significant number date from the 1630’s
onwards and the style is typified by an English broadsword circa 1630 bearing
both the inscription Andria Ferara31 and the running wolf32 mark from Passau and
Solingen. This collection also holds examples of the English rapier made by
Johannes Hoppie33 and in keeping with the breadth of style in this collection there
are two fine examples of swept hilt rapiers. Following these there is a large
number of swords dating from the second and third quarters of the 17th century
which are now often described as proto-mortuary hilted swords. While these
existed only marginally earlier and indeed ultimately alongside the classic
mortuary hilted sword they are more usually termed, horseman’s swords and are
identified by a simple side shell sometimes of cockle design a good example of
which is an English military backsword with a blade marked Andrea Ferrara.
These swords developed into what is often regarded as the archetypal mortuary
hilt, some of which carried the image of Charles I. A particularly fine example is
one decorated with foliage and fleurs-de-lys and mounted with a German made
broad two edged blade and pre dating the hilt which is 17th century.34 The range
of examples at Boughton covers the spectrum of mortuary swords the earliest,
dating around 1630 to the latest around 1680.
The English Civil War and the years immediately preceding it also provides this
collection with some of its important pieces of armour with a number of excellent
examples of early 17th century armour on display. These include several early
examples of English cuirassier armour, and at least one helmet, can be traced to
the Royal Workshops at Greenwich and is dated between 1620 and 1630. These
are supplemented by two pairs of English pikeman’s tassets and the front plate
from a gorget and pikeman’s pot, along with a fine close helmet and a well
preserved cuirass from a pikeman’s armour also dating from around 1630. These
are supplemented by two harquebusiers cuirasses of blackened steel dating from
the mid 17th century and adorning the foyer at Drumlanrig. Two English pot
helmets in the Armoury at Boughton date from later in the 17th century, probably
third quarter but are superbly well preserved examples of their genre.35
On the west wall of the Armoury there is a fine selection of swords catalogued
simply as English military broadswords. There can be very few examples of so
comprehensive a range of swords anywhere, illustrating the type of weapon used
from the third quarter of the 17th century through to the end of Marlborough’s
31
The marking of Andrea Ferrara is found on numerous blades of the 16th and 17th centuries the
majority of which are spurious. Ferrara worked from around 1530-1612 and such was the standard of
his blades that his mark became regarded as a measure of quality. His name subsequently became
associated with Scottish swords primarily based on a legend that he had worked in Scotland while
briefly exiled or possibly brought over to enhance Scottish blade making. One of the proponents of the
legend was Sir Walter Scott . There are numerous spellings of the Ferrara name and references to
specific swords replicate the spelling utilised on the blade itself
32
The running wolf, first associated with Passau became a regular feature of Solingen blades and is
seen on a significant number of swords in the Buccleuch collection. It came to be regarded as a quality
mark and was used by Solingen manufacturers and others in Spain, Italy and England.
33
Hoppie was a blade maker from Solingen who emigrated to England and established himself often
signing his blades Greenwich though in this case it is simply London. See Wagner p.76 and Weyerburg
p.21
34
This particular example carries the initials EIS and is etched at the forte with the arms of Stewart
Earls of Atholl and Lords of Innermeath.
35
The Royal Armouries holds the Littlecote Armoury with many similar examples illustrating
headwear and breast-plates for example III.1966 and IV.876
8
campaigns and beyond, and one with which both the members of the family and
the troops they commanded would have been very familiar.
The presence in the Armoury of these swords provides a tangible link to the
members of the Montagu family and to the soldiers who fought with Marlborough.
The pervading presence of another style of sword, which became an iconic
representation of the conflicts between Scotland and England, is the basket hilted
sword. This style of sword appears as early as the mid 16th century36 and
continues in use to the present day. Its zenith however was arguably during the
rebellion of 1745 and with be dealt with later.
By the early 1700s Boughton’s elegance was becoming increasingly well known
while the Dukes of Queensberry were developing Drumlanrig. William Douglas37,
the 1st Duke who held a range of titles including Justice General of Scotland and
Constable of Edinburgh Castle died in 1695 leaving his successor to continue to
enhance the estate along with strengthening the relationship between Scotland
and England. His part in promoting the Act of Union (1707) earned him the
epithet of the ‘Union Duke’. If there were still tensions between the countries this
is not reflected in the current Armoury which boasts a union of weaponry from
north and south of which any commanding General of that time would have been
proud.
One such General is the Duke of Marlborough and the presence in the collection
of two iconic swords, one the Sword of Ramillies
and the other the Sword of Oudenarde, both of which were carried by the Duke,
are at the pinnacle of an exemplary collection of weapons which fulfilled civilian
and military functions. These swords as a group represent facets of family and
estate life that are reflected in the superb quality of the pieces. A sword carried
by the 2nd Duke is also of great significance. An Italian dress sabre it carries the
arms of Montagu impaling Marlborough and appears to have been the subject of
sharpening which may indicate its use on campaign.38 Finally there is a sword
marked ‘Earl of Cardigan’s Sabre’ which is a silver mounted piece with a much
earlier blade marked “Genova” which, it has been suggested in family tradition,
may have been brought back from the Crimea
36
Blair C., The Early Basket Hilt in Britain in British Weapons and Fortifications by David H.
Caldwell. Claude Blair argues convincingly that this style originated in England and moved north. One
of the earliest examples is at Boughton
37
Ford J.D., Douglas William, 1st Duke of Queensberry (1637-1695), Oxford Dictionary of National
Biography, Oxford University Press (2004). He held numerous other high offices including High
Treasurer for Scotland and was Commissioner to the first session of the Parliament of James II & VII
38
The sword is made by Pimbert of Rome
9
Sword of Ramillies
This group of swords also represents the transition from the rapier to the small sword as it became more widely recognised as a fashion accessory rather than
primarily a weapon. Within this group are a number of swords with important
historical connections to the family. A fascinating sword with an inscription to
King Frederick Augustus of Saxony and Poland is dated 1701.39 One sword
however which arguably has a far stronger connection is an English mourning
small-sword. This is blackened and retains its original belt. The 2nd Duke of
Montagu was the Chief Mourner at the funeral in 1722 of the Duke of
Marlborough40 and given the date of this sword it is perfectly reasonable to
39
“Fried. Augustus. Konig in Pohlen und Churfurst zu Saxon 1701” for a similar inscription see
Wagner p.104
40
While living at Windsor Lodge, The Duke of Marlborough suffered a stroke in June 1722, not long
after his 72nd birthday. Finally, at 4 a.m on 16 June, in the presence of his wife and two surviving
10
consider that it may have been carried at that solemn event. As a group these
swords not only illustrate individual family and historic links, they also provide a
single combined example of the development of these weapons as acquired by
one family.
If there was ever a time of maximum impetus within the Buccleuch Collection it
began with the accession of the 2nd Duke of Montagu.
John, 2nd Duke of Montagu
It was at this point when the Armoury became an organised entity. The inventory
of 27th November 171841 lists two rooms which appear to be intentionally
discreet.
The first is the Armoury itself where there are listed:
530 Musketts
530 Bayonetts
100 Carbines
282 case of Pistolls and one odd one
Along with these in the ‘Old Wardrobe’
110 basket handle swords
170 brass hilted swords
daughters Henrietta Godolphin and Mary Montagu, he died. He was initially buried in the vault at the
east end of Henry VII's chapel in Westminster Abbey, but following instructions left by Sarah, who
died in 1744, Marlborough was moved to be by her side lying in the vault beneath the chapel at
Blenheim. In the Boughton Archives, as part of the Montagu Music Collection, (BH64), is a ms
annotated copy of Bononcini’s Mass for the Funeral of The Most Noble & Victorious Prince John,
Duke of Marlborough.
41
An inventory of the Goods of His Grace the Duke of Montagu at his seat at Boughton in
Northamptonshire taken on 27th November 1718 (BH6)
11
79 case of pistols
367 musketts
367 bayonetts
80 carbines
This group of arms came to pass well before the 2nd Duke became Master of the
Ordnance in 1740 and the task of organising the main Armoury had been vested
in Lewis Barbar a leading gunsmith from London. The detail of this is set out in a
letter to the Duke from his vicar Rev. Charles LaMotte in which he advises the
Duke:
“Mr Barbar has put up in the room next to your former apartment
about 500 musquets, about 100 Carbines and 260 pairs of pistols.
As for ye rest he has given directions to ye joiners how they shall
Be put up in ye great wardrobe, ye room looks exceedingly well.”42
It is interesting to note that the Armoury collection in 1718 appears a formal
arrangement whereas the collection in the ‘Old Wardrobe’ appears to be the
residue of material already held by the household. Evidence that there was
already a stock of weapons can be found in Mr Derit’s Accounts of an annual
payment to a gunsmith Peter Ryan (perhaps Ryall or Riou) in October each year
during the period 1701 to 1703 for the maintenance of guns held there.43
One of the most outstanding features of this collection is the assembly of guns
made by Lewis Barbar. Barbar was a Huguenot émigré from France. Louis (now
Lewis) returned to England between 1685 and 1690, though he had a troubled
beginning in the gun trade.44 Despite this he was admitted to the Gunmakers’
Company on 14th July 1704.45 His progression was rapid and having become
Warden of the Gunmakers Company in 1716 and 1717 was elected Master in
171846. The previous year he had been appointed Gentleman Armourer to King
George I and it reflects upon the power and influence of the Montagu family that
Barbar was then commissioned by the 2nd Duke to establish a formal Armoury at
Boughton. There are many records of purchases made by the 2nd Duke from
Lewis Barbar one of the most interesting for 200 muskets for £150 may be
directly linked to the disastrous St Lucia & St Vincent expedition.47 There is also
evidence of contracts for Barbar from Lord Cadogan, the Master of Ordnance in
172248
The current collection of pistols and long guns by Barbar comprises a total of over
60 weapons, the bulk of which form an awe inspiring display of one craftsman’s
work. This corpus forms a unique opportunity to study the work of one maker and
gunmaking in this early period. This is further enhanced, by the combination of
account books and artefacts. A garniture of remarkable uniqueness and quality
42
Letter from Rev. Charles LaMotte to the 2nd Duke of Montagu 7th June 1718 NCRO
This information is found in Mr Derit’s Account Book for Ralph Earl of Montagu 1698-1705. The
payment varies from £2.0s.6d to £3.2s.3d and includes in the latter case the provision of powder and
bullets.
44
In 1698 a raid took place on four Gunmakers premises, Barbar, Gorgo, Dolep and Gandoon and all
had stock seized and were fined. It may have been no coincidence that all were Huguenot émigrés.
45
Barbar was admitted on payment of a fine of £12 and submission of his ‘proof piece’ which was
described as very fine
46
Neal W.K., Great British Gunmakers pp.288-302
47
Mr Marchant’s Accounts for John Duke of Montagu 1722-1742
48
Neal W.K., ibid. It seems that Lord Cadogan wanted Barbar to make some specimen type muskets in
addition to the standard format. The fact that Barbar was one of those ho petitioned the Board of
Ordnance in 1718 regarding a relaxation of the specification for musket manufacture may have
afforded him this opportunity a few years later.
43
12
represents the pinnacle of his work. This comprises a pair of over and under
flintlock pistols with turn-over barrels; safety catches; grotesque masks on the
pommels and a turn-over flintlock long gun en suite, with the butt plate
containing a socket bayonet. Each escutcheon is engraved with the Montagu
crest. Many of Barbar’s guns involve the finest turn over barrels with highly
refined mechanisms and exhibiting an understated elegance. A few further
examples of his fine craftsmanship include a pair of turn off cannon barrel
flintlock carbines; a pair of double barrelled turnover flintlock pistols; a pair of
breech-loading flintlock holster pistols c.1725 and a break-action breech-loading
flintlock carbine including its leather pouch with spare chambers and steel pans
attached. The selection detailed in this paper recognises only the remarkable.
Alongside these, are guns of the highest quality and which functionally would
have been regarded as ‘state of the art’ but among this company, only excellent.
The majority of these guns carry the Montagu crest and many still remain in the
numbered pairs.
Pair of pistols by Lewis Barbar.
One final reference to Barbar is a partisan. Beyond the usual remit of a
gunmaker, this is a fine piece of craftsmanship and clearly intended as a
presentation piece in recognition of the relationship between Barbar and the
Duke.
The purchase of many of these pieces is recorded in the account books at
Boughton. One interesting discovery is that not only are there many direct
purchases by the 2nd Duke from both Lewis and John Barbar49 which are clearly
for the use of himself and his family, there is also an outstanding debt upon
which the Duke was paying interest at 5%. Duke John’s Accounts 1738-44 record
payments of £22.10s annually to Lewis Barbar against a debt of £900 and a
further £10 to John Barbar, Lewis’ son, against a debt of £400.50
49
It is interesting to note that the records list John rather than Lewis’ more famous son James
Duke John’s Accounts 1738-44. The payments come at Ladyday each year until 1742, the year after
Lewis Barbar’s death. In 1742 and 1743 the payment is made to the administrators of Lewis’ estate,
and at Michaelmas 1744 the whole debt of £1,300 is consolidated and paid off in favour of John
Barbar.
50
13
While it is not recorded in the account books when the original debt occurred, if it
was for the purchase of the weapons listed in the Armoury in 1718 the whole
account must have lasted more than 25 years.
There are also a number of pistols purchased by the Duke from other gunmakers.
This research has shown that in many of these cases they were manufacturers
who were like Barbar, Huguenot refugees such as Andrew Dolep51 and Jean Le
Maire. One, who was not, was Edmund Giffard52 who held the title of Gunmaker in
Ordinary to the King.53 Giffard as well as supplying the King supplied the Duke
with a remarkable pair of superimposed flintlock holster pistols. These must have
been ordered by the 1st Duke. They operated by virtue of a mechanism to allow
the first load to be fired without discharging the second! Further examples of
early breech loading guns include a pair by R. Rowland of London,54 and an air
gun by B.D.Fecht of Berlin dated 1792 complete with cylinders and original foot
pump, indeed the latter constitutes one of the more unusual items in the
collection. Finally a further example of patronage of senior figures in the
Gunmakers’ Company is represented by a flintlock holster pistol by Peter Boulton.
How Boulton became Master of the Company is perhaps more remarkable given
the fact that Blackmore records him being fined in 1700 for “giving the Master
opprobrious words with threatening to post him up a Coward at the Exchange if
he did not fight him” and being fined again in 1702 for actually assaulting him!55
51
Andrew Dolep was admitted to the Freedom of the Gunmakers Company on 5th August 1686. Like
Barbar some years later Dolep had been the subject of a number of confrontations with the Gunmakers
Company who were all powerful. Whether they eventually relented because of the quality of his guns
or more likely because he had obtained the patronage of the even more powerful Lord Dartmouth who
was at the time Master of Ordnance is open to speculation. It is certainly the case that like Barbar he
and other Huguenots were treated particularly harshly by the Company which is reflected in the
comparative size of fines meted out to them.
52
Giffard is recorded paying quarterage to the Gunmakers Company in 1677 and as Steward in 1679
however there is no record of when he received his Freedom of the Company
53
Wardrobe Warrant LC 5.41 (165) PRO
54
Blackmore lists Robert Rowland as manufacturing in London between 1715 and `1724
55
Blackmore, Dictionary p.57
14
Vitrine containing an outstanding selection of pistols, many by Barbar
A number of the items in the armoury at Boughton are recorded in a series of
Inventories and Account Books. One example is the inventory of John 2nd Duke of
Montagu’s Wardrobe conducted in 1749. Within this list are:
“2 powder horns with balls; Tow gunns or carbines; a sword; three paires
of pocket pistols and 6 pair of other pistols”56
What is particularly fascinating is to note the difference between the weapons in
the Armoury and a series of items which the Duke considered sufficiently personal
to regard as his own.57
In 1718 there were in total almost 900 muskets with bayonets and ostensibly the
capability to equip a significant armed force, supported by a selection of 500 buff
belts; 499 leather powder flasks; 425 cartridge boxes and belts along with what
are described as 416 “bayonet belts with bullet pouches to them”, there is no
doubt that this was a force to be reckoned with and the inventory indicates
sufficient equipment to support around100-125 mounted troops.58
Today there are far fewer long guns than listed originally but those in situ are of
high quality. They comprise a total of twenty one fusils mounted on the south
wall of the Armoury at Boughton. Most are Queen Anne fusils dated between
1707 and 1711. All made to the Ordnance specification of the day59 and with
locks variously marked with the names of London gunmakers such as Huggins,
56
A List of ye Wardrobe1749: The dress Inventory of John Duke of Montagu Boughton House
There is now no way of knowing whether the pistols referred to in the Wardrobe inventory are the
garnitures made for him by Barbar but it would not be an unreasonable assumption.
58
Inventory at Boughton November 1718
59
Lewis Barber was one of the gunmakers who in 1718 petitioned the Board of Ordnance with a
request to make the specification for military issue muskets less exacting.
57
15
Rose, Vaughan, Smart and Brush. The balance form a second group slightly
earlier than the others mostly carrying ‘Northamptonshire’ engraved on the lock
and in one case the Montagu crest. These two groups alone create a link to the
social fabric of the time when for Estates such as Boughton, the presence of
insurgents the capacity for an armed response was critical. One unusual inclusion
is a flintlock musket of Spanish manufacture, but with Board of Ordnance
markings. This puzzling anomaly may be resolved by the fact that in 1745 an
order was placed for 2,500 muskets from the Spanish, complete at 16s each.60
There is no doubt that some of the items purchased relate to the expedition
funded by the 2nd Duke to St Lucia and St Vincent, which had been granted to the
Duke on 20th June 1722.61 He appointed Nathaniel Uring as Deputy-Governor62
and Uring having equipped a convoy of ships, left Portsmouth on 10th September
1722. On the manifest are listed significant quantities of weaponry, but of
particular interest is reference to two easily identifiable artefacts in the Buccleuch
Collection today: “2 Machine Guns of Puckles”. 63 In the final pages of Uring’s
account of the expedition he estimates the Duke of Montagu’s losses on the
venture at upwards of £40,000!64
Turning attenti