The First Patent Machine Gun – The Puckle Gun (McClain, ASAC Bulletin 126)
THE FIRST PATIENT MACHINE GUN - THE PUCKLE GUN
by Joseph McClain
My passion for collecting guns was fueled in the seventies,
when I saved my money to buy what I, and many others consider,
the “Gun Bible” – Chinn’s Blue Books, The Machine Gun.1 Reading about the history of the machine gun ignited my interest in the
Puckle Gun. As fate would have it, I went off collecting cars and
tanks, but never lost sight of my main passion, collecting guns!
One particular gun that fascinated me was the Puckle Gun, an early form of a repeating firearm in the age of flintlocks. It is said to
be the first machine gun.
In London, England, on May 15th 1718, the Patent Office issued
patent number 418 to James Puckle for a revolving type firearm
(Figure 1). This is what I consider the most controversial in all
firearms history. I found the Puckle Gun allowed the various gun
engineers to advance the development of the gun to the next level.
Such as Collar, Colt and many others. This gun was designed
for use aboard Navy ships. British merchant ships and even Navy
ships were having trouble with pirates. The pirates were using
small boats that were very fast and maneuverable to effectively
engage with the big ships that only had large cannons. Thus, they
needed something that was a multi-shot and was maneuverable.
126/64
The Puckle Gun filled that niche with a nine-shot repeating capability. Reloading was accomplished by placing a fresh cylinder on
the rear (Figure 2)! However, in 1717 the Navy tested the Puckle
Gun and turned it down. Pirates are an ongoing problem, even
today. Thus, without the potential sales of this gun to the Navy,
production was stopped. I am told that only three of these guns
were manufactured.
One might say that the Puckle Gun was a concept gun that spurs
ideas in to the future. As collectors we have a desire to preserve
the prototypes that didn’t work. Rich in history, I was excited to
find out more about the gun and uncover little known facts and
educated the public on this history. For more information and a
video on the gun’s operation see: Puckle Gun (Video) - Forgotten
Weapons https://www.forgottenweapons.com/puckle-gun-video
My odyssey: acquiring an original Puckle Gun
In early 2013, I wanted to locate blueprints of the Puckle Gun,
believing that the gun would be impossible to acquire because it was
in London’s Tower Museum. Several of my friends and associates
recommended the most prominent source; the Leeds Museum and
Reprinted from the American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin 126:64-67
Additional articles available at http://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/resources/articles/
the Duke of Buccleuch based at Boughton House in Northhamptonshire. As I did more research, I learned that possibly there were additional gun(s) in Belgium or China and/or Russia at St. Petersburg
and possibly Tula Arsenal, the Kremlin and Copenhagen, Denmark.
As I continued to research and investigate the possibility of mul-
tiple guns, I learned that three Puckle Guns were made. I located
two guns, but the third was unaccounted for. Representatives of the
Duke of Buccleuch and the Tower of London, the holders of the two
known Puckle Guns, suggested I call Mr. Baer in Belgium, which I
did. He said, “I will not sell the plans or my gun!”
Figure 1. Original patent for the
Puckle gun.
126/65
Figure 2. Different views of the
Puckle Gun. Top: cylinder is
pulled back, ready to be replaced.
Middle: different angles of the rear
cylinders with numbers on them
for firing count. Bottom: back of
the gun and flint firing mechanism.
Not wanting to give up, I called him each month for six months.
In January 2014, he did not answer. I called again and again, but
no answer! It’s impossible to answer the phone when you’re no
longer alive! I learned that Mr. Baer had passed away in December
2013. In June 2014, I contacted and hired an English friend, Victor Huff, who made contact with the family in July. Negotiations
began poorly because Mrs. Baer could only speak Flemish and
Victor Huff’s second language was French, so we had to hire a
translator.
On August 8, 2014, I believe the family finally decided to sell
me the Puckle Gun and the plans (Figure 2) because they found my
name and phone number on a pad in Mr. Baer’s workshop. Finally, over many months of negotiations, we came to an agreement.
Then the complicated steps of physically getting the Puckle Gun
to the United States began. Fulfilling the contract clauses; making
shipping arrangements; having a crate built for the gun; working
with export companies; setting up Holland requirements to export
(customs, etc.); selecting a U.S. import company and Homeland
Security to handle U.S. import regulations; hiring an attorney;
126/66
traveling to West Palm Beach to have Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) and the U.S. Department of Justice write a letter from
the Firearms Technology Industry Service Branch (FTISB) rendering an opinion. All had to be organized and executed in perfect
sequence to successfully get the gun to the United States. All these
issues were finally moving forward when one after another, each
one derailed.
Shipping
At the time Belgium had experienced a series of gun-related terrorist acts. As a result, the Belgium government had closed the
borders to imported guns. I was afraid that Belgium would also
close its borders to out-going guns as well, and would lock the
Puckle Gun up in that fiasco. I asked Victor Huff to pick the gun
up and take it to his home in England. This too was not a good
idea. With the strong English gun laws there was the fear that the
Brits would declare the Puckle Gun a national heritage item and
seize it. Ultimately, we were able to get the gun on a plane to the
United States.
Crate Building
possible problem. I was wrong.
What’s the big deal?... Import regulations dictated that the type
of wood had to be “certified” and sprayed for bugs. I had to hire an
international cabinet maker to build and certify the box. Finding
a cabinet maker and the materials to build the cabinet was costly
both in money and time. For shipping considerations, this meant
that the anticipated crate weight and size doubled. Again, costly!
U.S. Import Customs and Homeland Security
International Export Companies
Originally, I hired an export agent in Belgium to arrange pick-up
of the crate containing the Puckle Gun and to put it on a plane for
the United States. All was great until I decided to switch the shipping point from Belgium to London and then to the United States.
This meant that I had to change shipping agents and find an agent
in London to arrange for the shipment to the United States. This
delayed shipment for months – but it got done!
Holland / England Officials
For the reasons I previously stated, Belgium Customs got excited when the paperwork indicated “Machine Gun.” Before anything
could delay the shipment again, I quickly moved it to England. As
well, English Customs saw “Machine Gun” on the paperwork and
held it up until customs shippers were able to explain why it was
not deactivated. Satisfied, English Customs released the box for
shipment and alerted the U.S. Government that a machine gun was
on its way to the United States.
ATF and The Firearms Technology Industry Service Branch
(FTISB)
Fortunately, I know a few ATF agents and requested a determination letter for the 1715 machine gun. ATF uses a point system
to make a determination. My gun was too old, had an obsolete
ignition system and used obsolete ammunition, etc. As a result,
ATF was kind enough to furnish me with a letter of determination
for the Puckle Gun. I put copies of the letter with the box, with
the paperwork, issued a copy of the letter to my attorney and the
ATF office in Miami. In doing so, I thought I had covered every
The Puckle Gun made it to the United States and was placed in
a small U.S. Customs office in West Palm Beach, Florida. Agents
from both Customs and Homeland Security had a major issue with
the Puckle Gun because the paperwork indicated, “Machine Gun.”
When I showed up to claim my box, Homeland Security, with the
help of Customs, wanted to arrest me! I asked both agencies if
they had read the documentation. Both said they had inspected the
gun and read all the paperwork. In reality, they had not! In order to
stay out of jail and move forward, I had to have my Import Attorney and the Head of Miami ATF work with the Customs Office and
get the Puckle Gun cleared for release. This added another couple
of days onto the entire process, but finally after all the roadblocks,
I took possession of the Puckle Gun!
Final Comments (or In Conclusion):
I don’t believe that Mr. Puckle was the original developer of the
first machine gun of this type, but that he bought, traded or stole
the idea from someone else. He seems to have earned his living as
a notary public and wrote a book called The Club.2 The fact that
Mr. Puckle patented the gun only, without the tripod, makes this
gun significant to the evolution of the machine gun. In my opinion
if he had developed the gun, he would have known how important the creation of the first portable, folding-leg tripod would have
been to the success of firing the Puckle Gun. He did not. Therefore,
in my opinion, he was not the original developer and should have
patented the tripod as well. What a mistake! I believe that a line
of thought for creation began with the Puckle Gun and the Collier
Pistol, followed through other inventors to the Colt patent. All information in the development of today’s revolver. Final thought:
In my life as a collector, I was told by an old collector that I should
never count my guns or tanks. The reason: when my wife asks me,
“How many guns or tanks do you have?” I can say, “Honey, I only
need one more!”
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chamberlain, W.H. J. and Taylerson, W.F. “The Puckle Guns” American Rifleman Vol. 137, No. 6, June 1989, pp. 31.
Hogg, Ian V “Percussion and the Breech Loader” The Story of the Gun, Bath Press, 1996, pp. 55-56.
ENDNOTES
1
2
Chinn, George M. The Machine Gun: History, Evolution, and Development of Manual, Automatic, and Airborne Repeating Weapons. US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
Puckle, James. The Club; or, A Gray Cap for a Green Head. A Dialogue Between a Father and Son. 1713. London.
126/67